SARS-CoV-2 Infection Related Hyperglycemia during hospitalization and three months post-discharge (preprint)

Hyperglycemia or diabetes mellitus during COVID-19 has always been a great concern and heralds severe forms of the disease, we also don’t know whether this condition will continue as diabetes mellitus even after convalescence. For this purpose we conducted a study to investigate this condition and factors related to it in hospitalized patients and even three months post-discharge we followed them up. We gathered data from 202 patients that fulfilled our inclusion criteria, among them 100 patients were hyperglycemic. Patients in hyperglycemic status experienced significantly longer duration of hospitalization than normoglycemic patients and significantly showed more severe forms of the disease. During their follow up three months post-discharge for the investigation of glycemic status, 46 out of 97 patients were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and have been taking anti-diabetic drugs while 29 patients only had normal glycemic status.

Differential associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection, perceived burden of the pandemic and mental health in the German population-based cohort for digital health research (preprint)

Introduction: Understanding the potential adverse effects of the Covid-19-pandemic remains a challenge for public mental health. In this regard, the differentiation between potential consequences of actual infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the subjective burden of the pandemic due to measures and restrictions to daily life remains elusive. Methods: Here we investigated the differential association between infection with SARS-Cov-2 and subjective burden of the pandemic in a study cohort of 7601 participants from the German population-based cohort for digital health research (DigiHero), who were recruited between March 4th and April 25th 2022. Data was collected using the online survey tool LimeSurvey between March and October 2022 in consecutive surveys, which included questionnaires on infection status and symptoms following COVID-19 as well as retrospective assessment of the subjective burden of the pandemic. Results: We observed an association of a past SARS-CoV-2 infection on deteriorated mental health related symptoms, whereas no association or interaction with burden of the pandemic occurred. The association was driven by participants with persistent symptoms 12 weeks after acute infection. On a symptom specific level, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as exhaustion and fatigue, concentration deficits as well as problems with memory function were the primary drivers of the association. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infections on mental health in patients suffering from ongoing symptoms 12 weeks after infection. As the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and mental health appeared more pronounced in populations with higher vulnerability for mental disorders, increased attention should be dedicated towards these subgroups regarding the prevention of infection.

Epileptic seizure and electroencephalographic characteristics of adult COVID-19 inpatients during the Omicron outbreak in China: a single center retrospective study (preprint)

Background This retrospective analysis assessed the characteristics of epileptic seizure and continuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) data in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the Omicron outbreak.Methods CEEG was performed in 28 patients, with 17 showing unexplained altered mental status and 11 suspected of having seizures. Demographic and clinical variables, imaging results, outcomes, and comorbidities were collected.Results In total, 1,405 patients with COVID-19 infection were admitted during the study period. The proportion of patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) care and the in-hospital mortality was 16.3% and 7.8%, respectively. Among patients who underwent CEEG monitoring, 11 were in ICU, and 17 were in regular wards. Of these, 8 patients (28.5%) had severe COVID-19, whereas 6 had acute neuroimaging findings. EEG findings were not specific, with 7 patients (25%) having normal EEG results. Furthermore, 11 (39.3%) had benign EEG alterations, 6 (21.4%) had malignant, and 4 (14.3%) had highly malignant. Six patients exhibited epileptiform abnormalities, including 1 with a prior epilepsy history. Moreover, 4 patients experienced electrographic seizures, with 2 manifesting as epilepsia partialis continua and 2 as nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Periodic and rhythmic patterns were observed in 2 patients, spike-and-wave in 1 patient and generalized rhythmic delta activity in another patient. EEG attenuation without reactivity was seen in 4 patients.Conclusions Seizures can manifest as early symptoms in individuals infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19. Despite the increased contagiousness associated with Omicron, we observed a higher prevalence of normal EEG results. This suggested that the Omicron variant may be associated with a lower likelihood of causing encephalitis or encephalopathy compared to other variants.

[Cryptogenic new-onset super-refractory status epilepticus following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A case report]. / Estado epiléptico superrefractario de nueva aparición criptógeno tras vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. A propósito de un caso.

INTRODUCTION: New-onset super-refractory status epilepticus (NOSRSE) is a neurological emergency characterised by the development of status epilepticus in a patient without epilepsy or any known prior neurological disease and with no clear structural, toxic or metabolic cause, which recurs after 24 hours of induced coma. The most common identifiable cause is inflammatory-autoimmune. Consequently, we present a case of NOSRSE related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as an opportunity to investigate the dysimmune origin of this pathology. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 40-year-old male who presented at the emergency department with fever and headache with no clear source of infection. His personal history included bacterial meningitis in childhood without any sequelae and protein S deficiency without treatment at the time, as well as vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 21 days earlier. He was initially diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and treated with cefuroxime. Two days later, he was taken back to the emergency department with confusional symptoms and tonic-clonic seizures. He did not respond to midazolam and finally required sedation and orotracheal intubation for refractory status epilepticus. While in hospital, he required a number of lines of antiepileptic drugs, ketamine, a ketogenic diet, immunotherapy and plasmapheresis in order to successfully limit NOSRSE. The aetiological study offered normal results for serology, antineuronal antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, transthoracic echocardiography, testicular ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography. Only the control MRI scan showed a diffuse and bilateral alteration of the right hemispheric cortex and thalamic pulvinar as the only finding. CONCLUSION: It is crucial to report suspected adverse reactions associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, thereby allowing continued monitoring of the risk/benefit ratio of vaccination.

TITLE: Estado epiléptico superrefractario de nueva aparición criptógeno tras vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2. A propósito de un caso.Introducción. El estado epiléptico superrefractario de nueva aparición (NOSRSE) es una emergencia neurológica caracterizada por el desarrollo de estado epiléptico en un paciente sin epilepsia ni enfermedad neurológica previa conocida y sin clara causa estructural, tóxica o metabólica, que recurre tras 24 horas del coma inducido. La causa identificable más frecuente es la inflamatoria-autoinmune. En consecuencia, planteamos un caso de NOSRSE relacionado con la vacunación para el SARS-CoV-2 como una oportunidad de indagar el origen disinmune de esta patología. Caso clínico. Varón de 40 años que acude al servicio de urgencias refiriendo fiebre y cefalea sin claro foco infeccioso. Entre sus antecedentes personales destacamos una meningitis bacteriana en la infancia sin secuelas y un déficit de proteína S sin tratamiento en ese momento, así como vacunación con ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 21 días antes. Fue inicialmente diagnosticado de infección del tracto urinario y tratado con cefuroxima. Dos días después, se le llevó de nuevo a urgencias con cuadro confusional y crisis tonicoclónicas, sin respuesta al midazolam, y requirió finalmente sedación e intubación orotraqueal por estado epiléptico refractario. Durante su ingreso requirió múltiples líneas de antiepilépticos, quetamina, dieta cetógena, inmunoterapia y plasmaféresis para conseguir limitar el NOSRSE. El estudio etiológico ofrecía normalidad de los resultados de serología, anticuerpos antineuronales en el suero y líquido cefalorraquídeo, ecocardiografía transtorácica, ecografía testicular y angiotomografía computarizada. Únicamente la resonancia magnética de control mostró una alteración difusa y bilateral de la corteza hemisférica y pulvinar talámica derecha como único hallazgo. Conclusión. Es crucial notificar las sospechas de reacciones adversas asociadas a la vacunación frente al SARS-CoV-2, permitiendo así una supervisión continuada de la relación riesgo/beneficio de ésta.

Analysis of risk factors for seizures and short-term reoccurrence of seizures in febrile children with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an observational study (preprint)

Background:With the epidemic of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) variant Omicron, its accompanying neurological manifestations have gradually attracted attention.The main objective of this study was to compare seizures in febrile children with and without coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) and to conduct a short-term follow-up in the COVID-19 positive group to investigate the risk factors for short-term recurrence of seizures in children with febrile seizures(FS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University for fever and seizures between October 1 and December 30, 2022.Based on the results of SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the patients were divided into a COVID-19 positive group and a COVID-19 negative group.Moreover,we followed up patients in the COVID-19-positive group for 3 months using outpatient or telephone follow-up, and the main content of follow-up included whether the patients had seizures after discharge and whether there were neurological abnormalities. Results:Compared with the COVID-19-negative group, the COVID-19-positive group had a higher proportion of seizure duration ≥ 15 minutes(18.7%VS5.1%;P=0.001), seizure ≥ 2 time(54.4%VS41.0%;P=0.024), status epilepticus(15.4%VS5.1%;P=0.005), and Electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities(29.4%VS13.6%;P=0.016).Seizures ≥2 time[P=0.015,OR(95% CI)=4.632(1.347-15.928)], peak temperature ≤39°C[P=0.001,OR(95% CI)=6.296(2.059-19.254)], and history of convulsions[P=0.005,OR(95% CI)=5.628(1.707-18.550)] were risk factors for recurrence of seizures within a short period of time in children with covid-19 infected febrile convulsions.In the COVID-19 positive group, three patients died and four patients had residual cognitive or motor dysfunction. Conclusions:The seizures were more severe in the COVID-19 positive group compared to the COVID-19 negative group.In addition, patients with COVID-19 who present with seizures and persistent impaired consciousness need to be alerted to serious neurological disorders such as acute necrotizing encephalopathy.

Association of Seizure with COVID-19 Vaccines in Persons with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (preprint)

Objective: Seizure following immunization, especially in persons with epilepsy (PwE), has long been a concern, and seizure aggravation followed by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is a serious issue for PwE. The immunization rate in PwE has been lower compared to same-age controls due to vaccine hesitancy and concerns about seizure control. Herein, we systematically reviewed the seizure activity-related events in PwE following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Four search engines were searched from inception until January 31, 2023, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was followed. Random- and fixed-effect models using the logit transformation method were used for meta-analysis. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Outcomes of interest included (a) pooled proportion of increased seizure frequency and (b) pooled incidence proportion of status epilepticus (SE) in PwE receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Results: Of the 2207 studies identified, 18 met eligibility criteria, of which 16 entered the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of increased seizure frequency (16 studies-4197 PwE) was 5% (95CI: 3%-6%, I2 =57%), further subcategorized into viral vector (3%, 95CI: 2%-7%, I2 =0%), mRNA (5%, 95CI: 4%-7%, I2 =48%), and inactivated (4%, 95CI: 2%-8%, I2 =77%) vaccines. The pooled incidence proportion of SE (15 studies-2480 PwE) was 0.08% (95CI: 0.02%-0.32%, I2 =0%), further subcategorized into the viral vector (0.00%, 95CI: 0.00%-1.00%, I2 =0%), mRNA (0.09%, 95CI: 0.01%-0.62%, I2 =0%), and inactivated (0.00%, 95CI: 0.00%-1.00%, I2 =0%) vaccines. No significant difference was observed between mRNA and viral vector vaccines (5 studies, 1122 vs. 198 PwE, respectively) regarding increased seizure frequency (OR: 1.10, 95CI: 0.49-2.50, p-value=0.81, I2 =0%). Significance: The meta-analysis proposed a 5% increased seizure frequency following COVID-19 vaccination in PwE, with no difference between mRNA and viral vector vaccines. Furthermore, we found a 0.08% incidence proportion for SE. While this safety evidence is noteworthy, this cost should be weighed against vaccination benefits.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The concept and understanding of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), and its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) have evolved in the recent past. This review aims to summarize the recent developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of these challenging conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: NORSE and FIRES can have many different causes. Although the list of possible causes is still growing, they mostly fall in the categories of autoimmune encephalitis and genetic disorders. However, despite extensive investigations, most cases of NORSE and FIRES remain cryptogenic. Recent studies have pointed towards the key role of autoinflammation as a unifying pathophysiological mechanism in these cases. These findings also support the use of immunomodulatory treatment in this setting. Consensus recommendations on the management of NORSE and FIRES have recently been published. SUMMARY: NORSE and FIRES remain challenging conditions to diagnose and treat. Recent findings from clinical and basic research and new recommendations, reviewed in this article, contribute to an emerging framework for management and future research.

Status epilepticus 2020. / Status epilepticus 2020

Status epilepticus is the second most common neurological emergency with 15‒25% mortality rate. The principle of "time is brain" is also true for the treatment of status epilepticus: the earlier we start an adequate treatment, the more likely we are to stop progression. With treatment protocols based on high-level evidence, the progression of status epilepticus can be prevented in 75­90% of cases: we can avoid the induced coma or death. At the beginning of status epilepticus, parenteral benzodiazepine should be given immediately: intramuscular midazolam (0.2 mg/kg, max. 10 mg). In the case of easy veinous access, benzodiazepines can also be given intravenously. If the first benzodiazepine bolus does not stop the status epilepticus, we speak about established (benzodiazepine refractory) status epilepticus. In this case, a fast-acting non-benzodiazepine antiepileptic drug should be given: intravenous valproate (40 mg/kg, max. 3000 mg, within 10 minutes) or levetiracetam (60 mg/kg, max. 4500 mg, within 10 minutes). Refractory status epilepticus that persists for more than 1 hour and does not respond to either benzodiazepines or antiepileptics should be treated with general anesthesia (full narcosis). Induced coma can be achieved with fast-acting anesthetics, a combination of propofol with midazolam is the most frequently used one. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(42): 1779­1786.

Smartphone- and Cloud-based Artificial Intelligence Quantitative Analysis System (SCAISY) for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG Antibody Lateral Flow Assays (preprint)

Smartphone-based point-of-care testing (POCT) is rapidly emerging as an alternative to traditional screening and laboratory testing, particularly in resource-limited settings. In this proof-of-concept study, we present a smartphone- and cloud-based artificial intelligence quantitative analysis system (SCAISY) for relative quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific IgG antibody lateral flow assays that enables rapid and accurate evaluation of test strips. By capturing an image with a smartphone camera, SCAISY quantitatively analyzes antibody levels and provides results to the user. We analyzed changes in antibody levels over time in over 248 individuals, including vaccine type, number of doses, and infection status, with a standard deviation of less than 10%. We also tracked antibody levels in six participants before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we examined the effects of lighting conditions, camera angle, and smartphone type to ensure consistency and reproducibility. This study suggests that SCAISY is a simple and powerful tool for real-time public health surveillance, enabling the acceleration of quantifying SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies generated by either vaccination or infection and tracking of personal immunity levels.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient under maintenance haemodialysis: A case report (preprint)

Background Endothelial dysfunction is common in patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis, and is a major cause of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Recently, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been shown to cause endothelial dysfunction by infecting vascular endothelial cells. Several cases of neurological complications in patients without kidney dysfunction, and only a few cases in patients with chronic kidney disease, have been reported in the literature. However, no previous report has yet described PRES associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Case presentation A 54-year-old woman undergoing maintenance haemodialysis was admitted to our hospital for epilepticus. She subsequently developed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to diabetic nephropathy. Seven days prior to admission, she had developed fever and was diagnosed with COVID-19. After diagnosis, her blood pressure increased from 160/90 mmHg to approximately 190/100 mmHg. On admission, she presented with severe hypertension (> 220/150 mmHg), unconsciousness, and epilepticus. CT tomography revealed no signs of brain haemorrhage. Cranio-spinal fluid (CSF) examination revealed no signs of encephalitis, and CSF polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 was negative. MRI findings revealed focal T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the bilateral parietooccipital regions, leading to the diagnosis of PRES. Deep sedation and strict blood pressure control resulted in a rapid improvement of her symptoms, and she was discharged without sequelae. Conclusions Herein, we report the first case of PRES associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient undergoing maintenance haemodialysis. Patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis are at high risk of PRES because of several risk factors. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes direct invasion of endothelial cells by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), initiating cytokine release, and hypercoagulation, leading to vascular endothelial cell injury and increased vascular leakage. In the present case, SARS-CoV-2 infection may have triggered the development of PRES.

Scoping review of rational polytherapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

There is a paucity of literature regarding the optimal selection of combination antiseizure medications (ASMs) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The aim of this scoping review is to evaluate current evidence related to "rational polytherapy" among adults with DRE. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCr) guidelines, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched using DRE- and polytherapy-related keywords. The exclusion criteria applied included: non-English; non-human studies; non-research studies; participants less than 18 years; status epilepticus; ASM monotherapy; and certain ASMs. In Covidence, two researchers independently reviewed articles for inclusion at each phase, with a third resolving conflicts. Data were extracted, with quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Of the 6477 studies imported for screening, 33 studies were included. Clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes were reported by 26, 12, and one study, respectively. Common efficacy-related clinical outcomes included ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (n = 14), seizure freedom (n = 14), and percent reduction in seizure frequency (n = 8). Common humanistic outcomes included quality of life (n = 4), medication adherence (n = 2), sleep-related outcomes (n = 2), and physician and patient global assessments (n = 2). The economic study reported quality-adjusted life years. The median MMAT score was 80 (range: 60-100). Two studies referenced the standard definition of DRE, whereas five studies did not specifically define DRE. Gaps in the literature include limited generalizability, minimal reports in pregnancy, and lack of optimal ASM combinations, among others. Strengths of the evidence include addressing a variety of outcomes. Inconsistent definitions of DRE, small sample sizes, and heterogeneity among studies limit the ability to draw meaningful conclusions. Optimal combinations of ASMs for rational polytherapy for DRE is unclear.

Omicron BA.1/BA.2 infections in triple-vaccinated individuals enhance a diverse repertoire of mucosal and blood immune responses (preprint)

Pronounced immune escape by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has resulted in large numbers of individuals with hybrid immunity, generated through a combination of vaccination and infection. Based primarily on circulating neutralizing antibody (NAb) data, concerns have been raised that omicron breakthrough infections in triple-vaccinated individuals result in poor induction of omicron-specific immunity, and that a history of prior SARS-CoV-2 in particular is associated with profound immune dampening. Taking a broader and comprehensive approach, we characterized mucosal and blood immunity to both spike and non-spike antigens following BA.1/BA.2 infections in triple mRNA-vaccinated individuals, with and without a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. We find that the majority of individuals increase BA.1/BA.2/BA.5-specific NAb following infection, but confirm that the magnitude of increase and post-omicron titres are indeed higher in those who were infection-naive. In contrast, significant increases in nasal antibody responses are seen regardless of prior infection history, including neutralizing activity against BA.5 spike. Spike-specific T cells increase only in infection-naive vaccinees; however, post-omicron T cell responses are still significantly higher in previously-infected individuals, who appear to have maximally induced responses with a CD8+ phenotype of high cytotoxic potential after their 3rd mRNA vaccine dose. Antibody and T cell responses to non-spike antigens also increase significantly regardless of prior infection status, with a boost seen in previously-infected individuals to immunity primed by their first infection. These findings suggest that hybrid immunity induced by omicron breakthrough infections is highly dynamic, complex, and compartmentalised, with significant immune enhancement that can help protect against COVID-19 caused by future omicron variants.

COVID-19 Continuous-EEG Case Series: A Descriptive Study.

PURPOSE: Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) refers to coronavirus disease secondary to SARS-CoV2 infection mainly affecting the human respiratory system. The SARS-CoV2 has been reported to have neurotropic and neuroinvasive features and neurological sequalae with wide range of reported neurological manifestations, including cerebrovascular disease, skeletal muscle injury, meningitis, encephalitis, and demyelination, as well as seizures and focal status epilepticus. In this case series, we analyzed the continuous video-EEGs of patients with COVID-19 infection to determine the presence of specific EEG features or epileptogenicity. METHODS: All continuous video-EEG tracings done on SARS-CoV2-positive patients during a 2-week period from April 5, 2020, to April 19, 2020, were reviewed. The demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging, and EEG features were analyzed and presented. RESULTS: Of 23 patients undergoing continuous video-EEG, 16 were COVID positive and were included. Continuous video-EEG monitoring was ordered for "altered mental status" in 11 of 16 patients and for "clinical seizure" in 5 of 16 patients. None of the patients had seizures or status epilepticus as a presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection. Instead, witnessed clinical seizures developed as results of COVID-19-related medical illness(es): anoxic brain injury, stroke/hemorrhage, lithium (Li) toxicity (because of kidney failure), hypertension, and renal disease. Three patients required therapeutic burst suppression because of focal nonconvulsive status epilepticus, status epilepticus/myoclonus secondary to anoxic injury from cardiac arrest, and one for sedation (and with concomitant EEG abnormalities secondary to Li toxicity). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational case series of 16 patients with COVID-19 who were monitored with continuous video-EEG, most patients experienced a nonspecific encephalopathy. Clinical seizures and electrographic status epilepticus were the second most commonly observed neurological problem.

Infant with Loeys-Dietz syndrome treated for febrile status epilepticus with COVID-19 infection: first reported case of febrile status epilepticus and focal seizures in a patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and review of literature.

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare, autosomal dominant multisystem disorder that is caused by mutations of transforming growth factor-ß receptors. Mutations in SMAD3 and TGFB3 have been recently reported.LDS is characterised by the triad of arterial tortuosity, hypertelorism and a bifid uvula or cleft palate among other cardiovascular, craniofacial and orthopaedic manifestations. Patients with LDS show clinical and genetic variability and there is a significant risk of reduced life expectancy due to widespread arterial involvement, aortic root dilation, aneurysms and an aggressive vascular course. Thus early genetic testing is warranted if clinical signs and history are suggestive of this potentially catastrophic disorder.LDS predisposes patients to aortic aneurysms and early death due to vascular malformations, but neurological emergencies, such as seizures and febrile status epilepticus, have not been reported.Febrile status epilepticus is the most common neurological emergency in childhood. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in the paediatric population are not as well described in medical literature.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of febrile status epilepticus with COVID-19 infection in an infant with LDS. Our patient had focal epileptiform activity emanating over the left posterior hemisphere, which evolved into an electrographic seizure on video EEG. Such patients have a heightened risk of epilepsy in the future, and this occurrence is consistent with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy. Neurological complications such as epilepsy and status epilepticus in a patient with LDS have never been reported before.A brief review of literature is also given here.

Long-term COVID-19 booster effectiveness by infection history and clinical vulnerability and immune imprinting (preprint)

Background: Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA boosters in populations with different prior infection histories and clinical vulnerability profiles is inadequately understood. Methods: A national, matched, retrospective, target trial cohort study was conducted in Qatar to investigate effectiveness of a third mRNA (booster) dose, relative to a primary series of two doses, against SARS-CoV-2 omicron infection and against severe COVID-19. Associations were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Results: Booster effectiveness relative to primary series was 41.1% (95% CI: 40.0-42.1%) against infection and 80.5% (95% CI: 55.7-91.4%) against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19, over one-year follow-up after the booster. Among persons clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19, effectiveness was 49.7% (95% CI: 47.8-51.6%) against infection and 84.2% (95% CI: 58.8-93.9%) against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19. Effectiveness against infection was highest at 57.1% (95% CI: 55.9-58.3%) in the first month after the booster but waned thereafter and was modest at only 14.4% (95% CI: 7.3-20.9%) by the sixth month. In the seventh month and thereafter, coincident with BA.4/BA.5 and BA.2.75* subvariant incidence, effectiveness was progressively negative reaching -20.3% (95% CI: -55.0-29.0%) after one year of follow-up. Similar levels and patterns of protection were observed irrespective of prior infection status, clinical vulnerability, or type of vaccine (BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273). Conclusions: Boosters reduced infection and severe COVID-19, particularly among those clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19. However, protection against infection waned after the booster, and eventually suggested an imprinting effect of compromised protection relative to the primary series. However, imprinting effects are unlikely to negate the overall public health value of booster vaccinations.

Antibody response durability following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination in people with HIV receiving suppressive ART (preprint)

Background: Limited data exist regarding longer-term antibody responses following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination, and the impact of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time, in people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). We quantified wild-type-(WT), Omicron BA.1- and Omicron BA.5-specific responses up to six months post-third dose in 64 PLWH and 117 controls who remained COVID-19-naive or experienced their first SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time. Design: Longitudinal observational cohort. Methods: We quantified WT- and Omicron-specific Anti-Spike receptor-binding domain IgG concentrations, ACE2 displacement activities and live virus neutralization at one, three and six months post-third vaccine dose. Results: Third doses boosted all antibody measures above two-dose levels, but BA.1-specific responses remained significantly lower than WT-specific ones, with BA.5-specific responses lower still. Serum IgG concentrations declined at similar rates in COVID-19-naive PLWH and controls post-third dose (median WT- and BA.1-specific half-lives were between 66-74 days for both groups). Antibody function also declined significantly yet comparably between groups: six months post-third dose, BA.1-specific neutralization was undetectable in >80% of COVID-19 naive PLWH and >90% of controls. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted antibody concentrations and function significantly above vaccine-induced levels in both PLWH and controls, though BA.5-specific neutralization remained significantly poorer than BA.1 even post-breakthrough. Conclusions: Following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination, antibody response durability in PLWH receiving ART is comparable to controls. PLWH also mounted strong responses to breakthrough infection. Due to temporal response declines however, COVID-19-naive individuals, regardless of HIV status, would benefit from a fourth dose within 6 months of their third.

Encephalitis with status epilepticus and stroke as complications of non-severe COVID-19 in a young female patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are thought to be associated with the disease severity of COVID-19 and poor clinical outcomes. Dysregulated immune responses are considered to be mediating such complications. Our case illustrates multiple critical neurological complications simultaneously developed in a patient with non-severe COVID-19 and successful recovery with a multifaceted therapeutic approach. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interleukin-6 (IL-6) level was temporally correlated with the clinical severity of the status epilepticus in our patient, suggesting a causal relationship. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy 20-year-old female patient presented with a first-onset seizure. Concomitant non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed. CSF study showed lymphocytic pleocytosis with elevated IL-6 levels in CSF. During hospitalization under the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis, status epilepticus developed, and the seizure frequency was temporally correlated with the CSF IL-6 level. Furthermore, a new embolic stroke developed without a significant cardioembolic source. Contrary to the exacerbated COVID-19-associated neurological complications, COVID-19 pneumonia was cleared entirely. After treatment with antiseizure medications, antithrombotics, antiviral agents, and immunotherapy, the patient was discharged with near-complete recovery. CONCLUSION: Active serological, and radiological evaluation can be helpful even in non-severe COVID-19, and multidimensional treatment strategies, including immunotherapy, can successfully reverse the neurological complication.